|
|
|
|
|||||||
| General Discussion (Everything Else) Discuss anything that doesn't belong in any other forums here. |
| View Poll Results: Cost of Closing MRGO | |||
| 23 Million |
   
|
7 | 36.84% |
| 1.5 Billion |
  
|
3 | 15.79% |
| 16 Million |
  
|
6 | 31.58% |
| 867 Million |
  
|
3 | 15.79% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
09-14-2009, 09:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
the cost of the rocks to close the MRGO
learned something in class 
|
|
#2
09-14-2009, 09:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
what is the cost?
|
|
#3
09-14-2009, 09:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
guess
|
|
#4
09-14-2009, 09:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
guess sent out there
|
|
#7
09-14-2009, 09:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
zero?
|
|
#8
09-14-2009, 09:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
the actual rocks were zero dollars to tell ya the truth...the rocks came from 14 miles down the MRGO..they dreged and collected a half mile of rocks at the end of the long rocks on th MRGO and thats were the rocks came from...as far as expenses i couldn tell ya i imagine its alot though..i watched it happen day by day..and hated them closing it more and more..it wont help anything when it all boils down to it...
|
|
#9
09-14-2009, 10:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
sorry, thats what i meant, the rocks were free i know. but guess the cost of the project
|
|
#10
09-14-2009, 10:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
so was it 23 mill..i think i remember glenn throwing that number out there one morning...but im not sure..
|
|
#11
09-14-2009, 10:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
want the real answer now?
|
|
#12
09-14-2009, 10:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
yupp.
|
|
#13
09-14-2009, 10:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
1.5 billion
yes 1.5 billion wonder how much of that is in someones freezer or in a gold plated back-hoe wasteful spending at its finest
|
|
#14
09-14-2009, 10:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
wow...wow...wow...1.5 billion...geeez...bruh..they coulda just gave me 1 million and 2 years and saved about 1.4 billion dollars..i coulda did that with a welded up barge and POS excavater....well atleast the placing of the rocks anyways..maybe not the collecting and dredging..
|
|
#15
09-14-2009, 10:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
exactly what i was thinking hh
|
|
#16
09-15-2009, 04:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Their is no way it cost that! Yakem, what's the story on this?
|
|
#17
09-15-2009, 07:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is what my professor told me was the cost of the first phase in removing the funnel effect that flooded the st bernard area
|
|
#18
09-15-2009, 08:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just can't understand how our government works. I work in the oilfield and if we can erect a whole production facility in inland waters for uner a mil, then the Corps should be able to move some rocks for less than a million!
|
|
#19
09-15-2009, 09:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly. All they did was move rocks. Not haul them in
one guy tried to argue that coastal zone permits are expensive. And I was like Ive done permitting and know what it costs and it's not 1 billion dollars
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
